Sunday, December 13, 2009

updates, the property, and green house dreaming

It's been a while since I last posted. My opinion of President Obama hasn't changed. I still believe he is one of the worst things to ever happen to this country and I am sorely disappointed in the direction he and the Democrat led congress are taking this country (and unwillingly for a large part). But I am tired of reflecting on that.

Since I last posted I have found employment (back in June) and am happy to say that we are doing OK (not great, but OK). We are looking forward to the day when Becky graduates (Mother's Day) and we get to enjoy TWO salaries. Things are still tight financially, but they are manageable.

I am starting to explore options for our 3.6 acres again. The farmer that was leasing our land did not renew his lease. He provided us a name of a farmer that would lease our land, but I think we lost that somewhere. We can probably get it again, but we'll need to contact the previous farmer to get it. We're still mulling over whether we want to lease the land out this year or do something else with the land. We're possibly considering putting a garden on the land and maybe even letting the members in our branch put gardens on the land. I am also looking into permaculture and possibly how I might use it to start a small commercial operation growing produce. We are still a couple years away from building so we need to determine how to use the land in the meantime.

With permaculture, I can grow produce, raise some small livestock, or fish in an aquaculture, and possibly run a still to produce some ethanol. It would be better with more land, but I will make due with what I got and maybe see about leasing some nearby garbage land to make up the difference. It typically goes unused because it frequently floods, but I might be able to rehabilitate it with the proper application of some principles.

I am going to start working on building the geodesic green houses when I get some more disposable income. It may be late summer before that happens, so in the meantime, I am studying up how to build one using the calculator at http://www.desertdomes.com. I would like to raise a floor to the first level of the dome vertices and add the soil on top of that as a fully utilized raised bed. I would have a tunnel under/through the bed from the door to an access point in the middle of the greenhouse. This would allow me to use the entire space for growing (except for where the access point comes up). To facilitate accessing the produce for harvest without crawling all over it, I would like to create a slider on a track that would be elevated above the produce and could rotate around the greenhouse on a perimeter track. The slider track could rotate to any degree around the greenhouse, pivoting at the access point, and slide from the access point in the middle to the outside perimeter.

I may need to get some power tools. I have a chop saw that can cut the vertices and their angles but I will probably need to get a table saw and a circular saw at some point as well. I may also need to have some connection junctions where the vertices join machined. That might cost a little money, but with the economy the way it is, it might be easier to get a good price on them. Essentially, they will be metal polygons appropriate for the quantity of vertices they will be joining (which will be either 4, 5, or 6 vertices) with key holes cut, through which a lag bolt can be inserted and tightened. I would also like to route the edges of the vertices to create a seat for the greenhouse panes and then seal them all with silicon,except for a couple hinged panes used for venting during the summer.

I still have some time so I am sure I will see scope creep make this project ever more complex (I haven't even considered power and water yet). Should be interesting to see how it all turns out. Once I start I will take photos and video and post them so you can follow what I am up to in the project.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, March 15, 2008

a numbers game

I updated the business requirements document today and added a section on tracking and reporting. This is a section that I have not given much thought until today. I am lucky that the company for whom I work is a software company whose application has a tracking section. Their tracking is for marketing purposes rather than drill and test scores, but it gave me some ideas how to better organize the data for presentation.

Still, as I thought through the prototypical numbers that would be presented, certain types of drilling and testing scenarios threw wrenches into what I thought would be clean and simple numbers. In particular, drilling scenarios where a user ran through a drill multiple times covering the same question multiple times posed a conundrum for how to calculate or present a user's numbers. Additionally, a single card with more than one cue side could potentially pose a question for each cue. In a German-English deck, there might be a card with the values "das Buch" and "the book". Each side could be presented as a cue. Each side could be expected as a response. The card could potentially pose two questions in a drill. How is that counted? How is it presented?

I had to think about it for a while, but I hit upon the idea of a tracking section which provided a list of drill/test sessions that had been run, providing basic information at that level to help identify the session - like the deck name, the drill/test name, the user, and the date/time it was started. Clicking on a session would provide the session's report with a header section that included the session's aggregate data and sub sections that provided detailed data specific to each iteration of the drill that the user ran. The header and the sub sections would have total numbers as well as numbers relative to unique instances of a question to help distinguish where questions might have been covered multiple times in a drill.

The numbers are sure to be confusing to users who may not understand the distinction between "total" counts vs. "unique" counts or why the distinction would be drawn, especially if their drills are relatively simple (only one cue per card) or they only allow one iteration per drill. I can't help users that refuse to read the online help (although I wish there were a way to force at least an attempt at it). I know tracking numbers for the marketing application I support are a constant source of confusion especially where users compare dynamic changing data with data that is static relative to a point in time. This might also be the case with tracking in Flip.

The presentation challenge also got me thinking about revamping the main interface to provide more convenient access to the common areas of the application (like tracking) by offering something similar to Microsoft Outlook's wonderbar. That's something to consider down the road.

Labels: , , , ,